Home | Background | Guideline Use | ENTERPRISE | Contact |
||||||
CCTV | DMS | HAR | RWIS | VSL | Dynamic Speed Displays | Ramp Meters| Curve Warning Systems| Intelligent Work Zones | ICWS |
||||||
g | ||||||
|
||||||
g | ||||||
j | ||||||
|
||||||
h | ||||||
Device should be considered if: | ||||||
1a. Crash Rate Factor. The Crash Rate (crashes per million vehicle miles traveled) within the vicinity of the curve exceeds 1 crash per million vehicle miles traveled, when computed over a 3 year period.
OR 1b. The curve has been identified as a location with a high probability for crashes, using the locally accepted crash analysis (e.g. one of the top 10 locations in the state most prone to curve related accidents, or on a list of areas most prone to crashes). AND 2a. Speed Factor. The number of vehicles that has been observed to enter the curve at speeds that are considered unsafe is more than expected, based on the judgment of local engineers. (e.g., high profile vehicles entering rural curves at speeds believed to be unsafe, the 85th percentile speed exceeds the recommended or posted speed). OR 2b. There is evidence of near misses and/or rapid deceleration either within the curve or in the approach to the curve. (e.g. pavement skid marks, scrapes along guard rails) Reference: (1) Oregon Department of Transportation. Myrtle Creek Curve Crash Analysis. 2008. |
||||||
CCTV | DMS | HAR | RWIS | VSL | Dynamic Speed Displays | Ramp Meters| Curve Warning Systems| Intelligent Work Zones | ICWS |
||||||
Home | Background | Warrant Use | ENTERPRISE | Contact |
||||||
|